Home News Contact Us

Services Software Downloads Help Business Promotions Submit Your Website Business Articles

 

User Name:

Password:   

       

Client Login Google Ranking

Forgot Password

News
8-30-04  Global Web Monitor adds business transaction monitoring to its line-up of monitoring services.   >>

5-21-04  Global Web Monitor adds port security checking to its website monitoring service.                    >>

2-5-04  Global Competition Monitor is added to Global Web Monitor's  lineup of client services.                       >>

More Global Web Monitor News.  >>  

 
Services
Global Up Time

Global Competition Monitor

Global Site Analyzer

Sales
Sign Up for Global Up Time

Purchase Global Competition Monitor

Purchase Global Site Analyzer

 

Sign Up Now!

Free Trial

Sign up Website Monitoring Free Trial

Global Up Time

 

Information
How to Add a Monitoring Group

Global Up Time Error Codes

Articles

Small Business Tools

Corporate Business Tools

Privacy Policy

Terms of Use

 

Domain Name Dilemma:
 

 

Website Monitoring Services

HTTP/HTTPS (website monitoring)
  60 minute monitoring frequency. 1 min. to 4 hour intervals available.
  Alerting options - SMS, phone*, email, wireless email, pager
  False alarm protection.
  Daily, weekly and monthly website monitoring performance reports.
  Downtime error and recovery alerting in real time.
  Convenient monthly billing for services rendered.

Monthly Cost $4.95     First Year Cost with Free Trial $54.45

           

*Toll phone alerts are charged at the rate of $0.25 per alert in the US.

 

 

Do Dashes or Underscores Goose Google Rankings More?

Author: John Gergye
Email: john@traffic-test-tube.com


Domain Name Dilemma:  Do Dashes or Underscores Goose Google Rankings
More?
Copyright 2004 John Gergye

The debate rages. 

Some swear dashes in domain names send rankings soaring. 

Some have an ongoing love affair with underscores.

Others are sure there is no difference. 

While I agree you do get a bit of a bounce in Google if you
do this right - it’s only marginal. 

Still let’s end this debate once and for all and PROVE
which is better.  Using Google search results (SERPS) to
test if Google treats dashes or underscores the same or
differently. 

The guinea pig multi-word search term I picked is
"affordable search engine placement". 

To set a benchmark I first cast the broadest net possible
doing a search using affordable search engine placement

Google returned this:

  Searched the web for affordable search engine placement.
 
  Results 1 - 10 of about 78,600

That says 78,600 pages were indexed by Google for ANY of
those keywords. 

Next I searched on the same phrase only this time I
separated the words by dashes like this: affordable-search-engine-placement

Google turned up these results: Searched the web for affordable-search-engine-placement.
 
  Results 1 - 10 of about 1,160.

As you can see our term with dashes gave considerably fewer
results than the one without.

Then I searched on the same words separated by underscores:

     affordable_search_engine_placement

For this one Google didn’t find much: Searched the web for affordable_search_engine_placement.
 
  Results 1 - 4 of about 6.

Finally I searched for  "affordable search engine placement"

Note the quotes.  Using quotes limits the search results to
one specific phrase.

In this case Google returned: Searched the web for "affordable search engine
placement".  
  Results 1 - 10 of about 1,160.

If that looks familiar it’s exactly the same number of
pages as the keyword phrase with dashes returned. 

Okay so what have we got?

The first search returns what you could say is a free for
all of listings with any of the words in the keyword
phrase.  That’s why there are so many search results. 

Next the phrase with underscores produced negligible
results.  As in next to none.

While the keyword phrase with dashes and the exact phrase
search turned up the same number of SERPs. 

At this point you should be wondering "Why is that?"

  Glad you asked.  Even if you didn’t let me explain.

The reason for this apparent match of search results is
Google uses the dash to separate the words in the phrase.
Programmers call this a "delimiter".  In essence Google
sees the dash as a separator between the words.

Yet Google obviously does NOT treat the underscore as a
delimiter.  To Google it’s just another character.  Which
is proven by the search results.  Since if Google treated
the dash and underscore alike the number of SERPs returned
for

    affordable_search_engine_placement

    or

    affordable-search-engine-placement

would be identical.  But as you saw they are not.  Not even
close.

So the answer as to which is better, dashes or underscores,
is obvious now isn’t it?  You want to use dashes in your
domain names, folder names, files names etc.

That’s because using dashes to separate the words will give
you the biggest Google impact - whatever that impact may
be.  Since Google can parse the different words.  While
underscores don’t help one iota. 

Look.  This isn’t theory or speculation.  It’s fact.  And
you can repeat the same searches with any keyword phrase
you want and you’ll get the same results. 

Yet to keep this real don’t expect some kind of massive
boost from this dash trick.  Sure it can help a tad as part
of an over all optimization scheme.  But whether or not you
use dashes in a domain, folder or file name is not going to
be what gets you top Google listings.   Content and links
are.

Still this study does settle the debate about dashes and
underscores.  Giving you yet another little thing you can
do to rank well.


About the Author:

John Gergye shares more ideas like this in his just updated
eBook "Traffic From Google in 35 Days".  Find out more
here: http://www.traffic-test-tube.com/j/tfg35cl.shtml 
Or test your search engine IQ by taking his seo quiz
http://www.traffic-test-tube.com/search-engine-quiz.shtml
and get the free special report "Coming Out On Top".

 

Global Up Time
Register for a full service Global Up Time account today.


Copyright ⓒ 2003 - 2005 Global Web Monitor.  All rights reserved